Translating Classical Buddhism to Modern English

The Related Discourses

35. Views

64-66 (162). Nihilism

1. Thus I have heard:[1] One time, the Buddha was staying at Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park in Jeta’s Grove of Śrāvastī.

2. It was then that the Bhagavān addressed the monks, “Because of what’s existence, what’s cause, being bound by what, adherence to what, and viewing what as self do sentient beings make such views and such statements as this? ‘Suppose someone acts and instructs others to act, cuts and instructs others to cut, boils and instructs others to boil, and kills and instructs others to kill. They harm sentient beings, steal other’s property, commit sexual misconduct, knowingly speak falsehoods, and drink alcohol. They penetrate walls, cut chains, and steal [from buildings]. They even go down the roads and destroy villages, destroy cities, and destroy the populace with a wheel of the sharpest blades that slices, dices, and chops them up into a great pile of flesh. To train in this way is not a cause or condition for evil, and it doesn’t bring bad [results]. Suppose they kill and injure people south of the Gaṅgā River and make a great congregation to the north of the Gaṅgā River. Those wouldn’t be causes or conditions for good and evil, nor would they bring good and bad [results]. Doing things like bestowing gifts, training, maintaining [scriptures], performing blessings, and sharing benefits doesn’t create merits, either.”’”[2]

3. The monks said to the Buddha, “The Bhagavān is the Dharma root, the Dharma eye, and the Dharma refuge …”

It’s explained in detail the same as the remainder of SĀ 35.7, and the next two sūtras are like SĀ 35.8-9 above but with this introduction.


Notes

  1. Parallels for this sūtra include SN 24.6, DN 2, and DĀ 27. [back]
  2. This wrong view is attributed to Pūraṇa Kāśyapa in both DN 2 and DĀ 27. [back]

Translator: Charles Patton

Last Revised: 1 November 2023